Impartiality key when picking judges


by Jeffrey G. Frank and Morris G. Shore
for the Yakima Herald-Republic

COMMENT ON THIS STORY
Posted by Nick at 07/20/08 07:10AM        Post ID#: #118

Elections of "non-partizan" judges leave too much to chance. They hardly ever "campaign" and it is near to impossible to know how they think in advance of their rulings, making it impossible to choose a judge that may, or may not, make good, consistent, responsible decisions. most judicial elections become a dart-throwing exercise to make the choice. It is too easy to take for granted that because a person is a judge, they are capable of judging. All too untrue, but we never know it until it's too late. There are those who would legislate from the bench, a common thing to do these days. To have an activist judge is not a good thing and there is almost never any oversight organization that can do anything about it when it happens. Frankly, electing a judge, to me, is more important than the President, simply because of the powers invested in the judgeship.

Report Violation

Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Comment writers should refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks, and comments should be free of any personally identifiable information, such as e-mail addresses, mailing addresses and phone numbers. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the “report violation” link by the comment.